Notes below...<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Kaarel Kaljurand <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kaljurand@gmail.com">kaljurand@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi,<br>
<div class="im"><br>
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 4:40 PM, David Whitten<br>
<<a href="mailto:david.whitten.cyc@gmail.com">david.whitten.cyc@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Has there been any discussion about handling "just" in Attempto:<br>
> i.e.:<br>
><br>
> Every American has just one President.<br>
><br>
> It seems to be a way to differentiate between<br>
><br>
> Every American has one mother.<br>
> and<br>
> Every American has one President.<br>
><br>
> I guess other examples would be<br>
><br>
> The team has just one leader<br>
> Each organization has just one headquarters.<br>
<br>
</div>"just" is currently supported (in APE's built-in lexicon)<br>
as an adverb, i.e. a content word<br>
with now particular semantics. I.e. one can say:<br>
<br>
John owns a car just.<br>
John just owns a car.<br>
</blockquote><div><br><br>
The first sentence doesn't really make since to me, and I do agree<br>
the second use is an adverb (modifying a verb) to limit the range<br>
of the verb to owning a car and nothing more, perhaps in a context<br>
where someone else owns a car, a mansion and a yacht.<br>
<br>
I do want to mention that as I was taught "adverbs", the use<br>
of the word "just" to modify an adjective "one" is totally appropriate.<br>
Does your note mean that the parser can't handle adverbs that<br>modify adjectives ? <br>(I'm not sure what a "now particular semantics" means)<br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
These sentences are syntactically OK, but probably misleading,<br>
so maybe we should<br>
remove "just" from the lexicon and declare these sentences syntax<br>
errors. (Of course, users can reintroduce "just" in their user lexicon.)<br>
<br>
ACE does offer "exactly" and "nothing but" as function words.<br>
These words seem to cover some (semantic) aspects of "just".<br>
<br>
Every American has exactly one President.<br>
Every koala eats nothing but eucalypt-leaves.<br>
<br>
I guess we have considered "just" to be too ambiguous to force it<br>
into a single meaning...<br>
<br>
--<br>
<font color="#888888">kaarel<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>I don't consider it ambiguous, however it is a usage that may not be part<br>of your original design.<br>