[Attempto] Protege OWL integration

[Kaarel Kaljurand]

Hi,

On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 11:13, Kiran Prakash Sawant
<KiranPrakash_Sawant at infosys.com> wrote:
>
> For some reason, the conversion from ACE to OWL is not working properly. I have tried using ‘APE Local’ as well as ‘APE Web service’. Whenever I try to add a new snippet to the ontology, the Protégé tool stops working for a while, and after that starts working as if the snippet was never added to the ontology.

Can you send me the snippet(s)? A delay might be caused by the fact that
the APE Web service could not be contacted, e.g. there was a problem with
internet connection. And maybe the APE Local has not been set up properly.
It's difficult to speculate without knowing the details...

> Also, I had some problem making the OWL verbalizer work inside of Protégé. The ontology that I had added contained 4 SWRL rules. Out of these, only one was represented in the list, that too not as a ACE text. The rule was represented inside of ‘/* … */’ section, thus commenting it out. But at least it was able to recognize it as a SWRL rule. The other rules were completely ignored.
>

The verbalization of SWRL rules is currently not implemented. The main
reason why I have delayed implementing this is that Protege 4.0 cannot
serialize SWRL rules in non-RDF XML. If I've understood correctly then P4.1
does not have this limitation. So I'll start working on this feature
once ACE View
is compatible with P4.1 (sometime late this year).

--
kaarel